Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:14:22 +0300
From:      Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
To:        Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: rcvar function in rc.subr
Message-ID:  <20061126181422.GA66009@comp.chem.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <4569A113.5080106@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <1161268403.89897.1.camel@mayday.esat.net> <20061126121907.GC60959@comp.chem.msu.su> <4569A113.5080106@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 02:13:39PM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:33:23PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> >> Does anybody have a clue why /etc/rc.d/foo rcvar prints a leading '$'
> >> before the variable name? Doesn't make much sense with /bin/sh.
> > 
> > Sorry for the late reply.  According to the CVS history, the code
> > was just imported from NetBSD.  Perhaps it's too late to change it
> > as people are likely to have workarounds for it already.  Of course,
> > $foo_enable=YES looks ugly and has a different meaning in sh(1).
> 
> Well, it may be worth fixing in HEAD even if we don't MFC the change.

Then just do it!  Well, if no serious objections appear in a
reasonable period of time.  Personally, I'm happy with the change
-- I'm just not enough unhappy with the current bogosity. :-)

-- 
Yar



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061126181422.GA66009>