Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:36:00 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: ticso@cicely.de, ticso@cicely12.cicely.de Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bootspi parameters Message-ID: <20061210.163600.1102529578.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20061210210127.GF54209@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20061208.085456.-1548240230.imp@bsdimp.com> <20061208161425.GU54209@cicely12.cicely.de> <20061210210127.GF54209@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20061210210127.GF54209@cicely12.cicely.de>
Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
: On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:14:25PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:54:56AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > > In message: <20061208131314.GQ54209@cicely12.cicely.de>
: > > Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
: > > : It seems that you've put the boot commands into an external eeprom
: > > : instead of the previously hardcoded values.
: > > : Am I right with this assumption?
: > > : Since I don't have an additional eeprom on board I'll still need
: > > : hardcoded values - or put them into SPI-flash.
: > >
: > > What device are you booting from?
: >
: > currently network via bootspi.
: > This works after updating as usual.
: > Still no SD card however.
: >
: > Now I'm trying boot2 and SD card:
: > MAC 0:e:42:2:0:21
: >
: > Default: /boot/kernel/kernel.gz.tramp
: > boot:
: > No /boot/kernel/kernel.gz.tramp
: >
: > Default: /boot/kernel/kernel.gz.tramp
: > boot: MAC 0:e:42:2:0:21
: >
: > Default: /boot/kernel/kernel.gz.tramp
: > boot:
:
: Strange - now that this is an UFS formated media:
: MAC 0:e:42:2:0:21
: Not ufs
:
: Default: /boot/kernel/kernel.gz.tramp
: boot:
: No /boot/kernel/kernel.gz.tramp
:
: Default: /boot/kernel/kernel.gz.tramp
: boot:
:
: I've found -DUFS1_ONLY in the boot2 Makefile.
: Sounds like I should newfs the media and restart...
That would help a lot... I did that originally to make things fit,
but now that I've whacked a lot of the extra junk out of there we can
likely remove it...
Re 5MHz vs 30Mhz. I've had no reliability problems running at 30MHz
on two different boards (two instances of the KB9202, and 4 different
of our boards). Maybe there's a little noise introduced somehow
that's throwing things off...
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061210.163600.1102529578.imp>