Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:10:35 +0800
From:      Rong-En Fan <rafan@freebsd.org>
To:        Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, sumikawa@freebsd.org, Rong-En Fan <rafan@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: sysutils/xbattbar for !i386
Message-ID:  <20061212121035.GB33414@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw>
In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0612120057j7ab3c6fdxb3761c7e6ef4cae6@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20061212064859.GA33414@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <790a9fff0612112345k2e727817j34d2acf3881186cd@mail.gmail.com> <790a9fff0612120057j7ab3c6fdxb3761c7e6ef4cae6@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--cmJC7u66zC7hs+87
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 02:57:12AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On 12/12/06, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 12/12/06, Rong-En Fan <rafan@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> Recently, I installed a FreeBSD/amd64 laptop. I found this port
> >> uses apm (i386 only) interface to get battery information. The
> >> patch below changes it to use sysctl(3). Thus, it is usable on
> >> amd64.
> >>
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/xbattbar.diff
> >>
> >> It works on my ThinkPad X60 (-CURRENT). If you are running this
> >> port, please have a test.
> >>
> >Works on my HP dv8135nr (-CURRENT) system.
> >
> I have updated the patch so that it can be compiled for systems that
> have either an APM or ACPI interface for battery status.
>=20
> The Makefile has been changed to always use the ACPI interface when
> not being built on the i386 arch (i.e. amd64, ...).  On the i386 arch
> it defaults to ACPI, but can be changed via the options menu to use
> APM.

The way you handle OPTIONS is incorrect. See Porter's Handbook and/or
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2006-May/093088.html
for details.

As for APM/ACPI knob, I think APM is necessary on 4.x. Not sure=20
about 5.x status. If acpi on 5.x is usable, I suggest we just
use acpi and use apm on 4.x i386 only?

Regards,
Rong-En Fan
>=20
> Scot
>=20
> --=20
> DISCLAIMER:
> No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.


> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


--cmJC7u66zC7hs+87
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFfpw7144QkYb9jGgRAgk6AJ9PXQ/BcwGpnCIn8vq3LSLoNOdhHwCeNUe8
h91aD2rNTTyrdhV3QEA6KQ0=
=XAcr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cmJC7u66zC7hs+87--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061212121035.GB33414>