Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:45:41 +0200 From: Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <bofh@redwerk.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... Message-ID: <20061219094541.GF1006@office.redwerk.com> In-Reply-To: <200612191141.12890.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061218083751.T28249@turing> <20061219080444.GA1006@office.redwerk.com> <200612191141.12890.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:41:12AM +0200, Achilleas Mantzios wrote: > ???????? ?????????? 19 ???????????????????? 2006 10:04, ??/?? Eugeny N Dzhurinsky ????????????: > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote: > > > It should also be run with libthr as the > > > threading library, as the consensus seems to be that this provides better > > > performance than libpthread (libkse). > > > > Very interesting. Could you please clarify how to use libthr on 5.5/6.2, > > will there be a need to recompile everything? > > no just setup /etc/libmap.conf, like > [/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java] > libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 Nice, is it possible to see does it really uses libthr.so.2? -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061219094541.GF1006>