Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:51:37 +0200
From:      Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
To:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others...
Message-ID:  <200612191151.37416.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061219094541.GF1006@office.redwerk.com>
References:  <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <200612191141.12890.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <20061219094541.GF1006@office.redwerk.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 =CE=A4=CF=81=CE=AF=CF=84=CE=B7 19 =CE=94=CE=B5=CE=
=BA=CE=AD=CE=BC=CE=B2=CF=81=CE=B9=CE=BF=CF=82 2006 11:45, =CE=BF/=CE=B7 Eug=
eny N Dzhurinsky =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:41:12AM +0200, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
> > ???????? ?????????? 19 ???????????????????? 2006 10:04, ??/?? Eugeny N=
=20
Dzhurinsky ????????????:
> > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote:
> > > > It should also be run with libthr as the
> > > > threading library, as the consensus seems to be that this provides
> > > > better performance than libpthread (libkse).
> > >
> > > Very interesting. Could you please clarify how to use libthr on
> > > 5.5/6.2, will there be a need to recompile everything?
> >
> > no just setup /etc/libmap.conf, like
> > [/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java]
> > libpthread.so.2                 libthr.so.2
>
> Nice, is it possible to see does it really uses libthr.so.2?
smth like
smadev# ldd /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java
/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java:
        libz.so.3 =3D> /lib/libz.so.3 (0x28083000)
        libpthread.so.2 =3D> /usr/lib/libthr.so.2 (0x28093000)
        libc.so.6 =3D> /lib/libc.so.6 (0x280a5000)
smadev#



=2D-=20
Achilleas Mantzios



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612191151.37416.achill>