Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:35:09 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linuxolator: amd64 Linux Test Project failures Message-ID: <20061229213509.GA86839@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0612290911t5ae69715gd2bf0dda0f9228f2@mail.gmail.com> References: <790a9fff0612290911t5ae69715gd2bf0dda0f9228f2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:11:00AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > I'm seeing similar failures on these functions when running the > ltp-20061222 tests on amd64: > > linux_[access, chdir, chmod, chown, chroot, creat, lchown, link, > lstat, mkdir, mkdirat, mknod, rename, rmdir, stat, statfs, symlink, > truncate, unlink] > > The problem is that the ltp tests are passing in a negative value for > the path into the functions, and is expection a return value of > EFAULT. Instead they are returning with (i.e access03): > > access((char *)-1,R_OK) failed with errno 2 : No such file or > directory but expected 14 (EFAULT) > > I added a printf before the LCONVPATHEXIST macro: > > printf(ARGS(access, "Checking if path [%p/%p] exists"), (char > *) -1, &args->path); > LCONVPATHEXIST(td, args->path, &path); > > and it resulted in the following output: > > Dec 29 03:32:32 hp010 kernel: linux(1259): access(Checking if path > [0xffffffffffffffff/0xffffffffa31f2be0] exists) forget my last mail.. the flu strikes badly.. anyway - remove the & and post the results I think I know what might cause the bug.... thnx roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061229213509.GA86839>