Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:22:41 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: joel@FreeBSD.org Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: The end of the contributors article Message-ID: <20070115.212241.00489018.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1168765723.1100.13.camel@jesus.automatvapen.se> References: <1168633900.1082.38.camel@jesus.automatvapen.se> <20070114.015751.59745560.hrs@allbsd.org> <1168765723.1100.13.camel@jesus.automatvapen.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_15_21_22_42_2007_247)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org> wrote in <1168765723.1100.13.camel@jesus.automatvapen.se>: jo> S=F6n 2007-01-14 klockan 01:57 +0900 skrev Hiroki Sato: jo> > Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> wrote jo> > in <1168633900.1082.38.camel@jesus.automatvapen.se>: jo> > jo> - This information does not really belong in an article. jo> > = jo> > Could you elaborate this? As mentioned in the previous mail, I = think jo> > this information should be in an independent database file, not jo> > belong in either article or an HTML page in the www tree. jo> = jo> Yes, I remember you suggesting this XX months ago, and I *really* l= ike jo> the concept of storing developer information (such as login id, pgp= key, jo> current hats, commit bit type, location etc) in a database, but the= jo> truth is that I haven't seen any progress since then. I consider m= y jo> work to be the best solution in the meantime. Sorry for my laziness... I think your work does not conflict with the= idea, and updating the list is really great regardless of which tree is used. What I wanted to know is if you intend to restructure the list by removing ones in the articles and maintaining a copy in the www tree on a long term basis (from your post I thought you wanted to do so). I am (still) planning to work on restructuring the list by using a directory, so I just think I will need more discussion if the plan conflicts with your idea. If your proposed patch is committed now, probably I will move the data part to a database in other than the www tree when my patch is ready---but I do not want to make you offended when I commit such a change. So, well, please go ahead if you do not mind it since updating the list is really important. But if you have another plan such as maintaining the list in an HTML page only, please elaborate the plan in more detail. Just I want to make sure. -- = | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_15_21_22_42_2007_247)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFq3ISTyzT2CeTzy0RApm2AJ45jWL6JAalKZn3MePi2F+ic5a+BQCfcKT0 rokSGrTmQiMMc+1nqHTgE5w= =et4W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_15_21_22_42_2007_247)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070115.212241.00489018.hrs>