Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:30:26 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local/share/mk ? Message-ID: <20070201123026.C84181@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20070201194417.GA73296@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500 References: <20070201111727.B83474@xorpc.icir.org> <20070201192051.GA72926@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070201113720.D83474@xorpc.icir.org> <20070201194417.GA73296@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
and to answer to your second point...
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> > In term of port's backward compatibilty, the extra .PATH or -I
> > could be supplied by the files in /usr/ports/Mk which people
> > are expected to update anyways, right ?
>
> That Makefile.kld would be a fragment of a port makefile, right? Your
> bsd.linux_kmod.mk could go in /usr/ports/Mk although it seems to make
> more sense as part of /usr/src.
the layout i see is this:
in ports/multimedia/linux-ov-kld: one of the linux-ported drivers
files/Makefile.kld
files/patch-hopefully-empty
Makefile
... fetch linux source
... apply local patches
... copy Makefile.kld into ${WRKSRC}
do-build:
${MAKE} -I ${PREFIX}/share/mk -f Makefile.kld depend all
Again, if we could spare the -I ${PREFIX}/share/mk because it is already
supplied once for all in the environment set in /usr/ports/Mk,
that's less chance of making mistakes or hardwiring choices.
As for ports/devel/linux-bsd-kmod: it would install the bsd.linux_kmod.mk
into ${PREFIX}/share/mk
and then either add .PATH: /usr/local/share/mk to /etc/make.conf,
or print a message asking the sysadmin to do so
cheers
luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070201123026.C84181>