Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:09:16 +0100 (CET)
From:      Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch>
To:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
Cc:        rob@debank.tv, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 6.2-Release and Clamd 0.90 with libpthread.so
Message-ID:  <20070221000830.V4139@godot.imp.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20070220234734.H4139@godot.imp.ch>
References:  <20070220153632.E4139@godot.imp.ch> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0702201138080.12034@sea.ntplx.net> <20070220174221.B4139@godot.imp.ch> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0702201145420.12034@sea.ntplx.net> <20070220190347.C4139@godot.imp.ch> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0702201319230.12034@sea.ntplx.net> <20070220225303.V4139@godot.imp.ch> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0702201724590.12034@sea.ntplx.net> <20070220234734.H4139@godot.imp.ch>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Sigh,

>
> Useing daemon(3) instead of fork seems to fix the problem.

Of course deamon(3) calls fork, and after a short time I
had again the same ktrace output and CPU usage.

Martin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070221000830.V4139>