Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Mar 2007 13:53:33 +0000
From:      "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@freebsd.org>
To:        Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Improved INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE
Message-ID:  <20070324135333.GA86105@FreeBSD.czest.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20070324113739.GA41119@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
References:  <20070324113739.GA41119@ravenloft.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:37:39PM +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:19:49PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> > Current implementation of INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE option has number of
> > issues. Including it in MAC or SMP configurations will bring only text
> > of this single file into the kernel file. We're not able to see
> > configuration of running ("live") kernel, which could be helpful while
> > tracking users' reports. You can't get easy to use file format, ready
> > for configuration process.
> > 
> > In my Perforce wkoszek_kconftxt branch:
> > 
> >   //depot/user/wkoszek/wkoszek_kconftxt/...
> > 
> > I brought some modifications to existing config(8) and added system
> > interface that would let us to see configuration of running kernel
> > (currently -- via kern.conftxt sysctl), as well as other kernel file
> > through config(8)'s -k option.
> 
> By the way, any plan to include INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE in GENERIC?

I'd like to have this enabled by default, and I know there should be no
strong objections.

-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkoszek@FreeBSD.org
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070324135333.GA86105>