Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:18:17 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> To: usleepless@gmail.com Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@freebsd.org>, freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pvrxxx, linux code and modules Message-ID: <20070417001817.GZ73385@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <c39ec84c0704161551i29914e70vd78f725f765c0c04@mail.gmail.com> References: <c39ec84c0704151508t126cf975gaa1957b9205d3244@mail.gmail.com> <20070416055055.GC1593@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20070416212605.GV73385@funkthat.com> <c39ec84c0704161551i29914e70vd78f725f765c0c04@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
usleepless@gmail.com wrote this message on Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 00:51 +0200: > On 4/16/07, John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> wrote: > >Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote this message on Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 15:20 +0930: > >> - I need to understand better how tuners work. I've been thinking of > >> writing a document on the subject, something that people could use > >> for help when writing drivers. If you know of anything, even > >> partial or badly laid out, please let me know. > > > >Just to reiterate, tuner code really should be located in userland.. > >it's not time sensitive, and can't corrupted state of the kernel.. > > > >As for tuners, most/all of them communicate through the i2c bus... > >The tuner is programed w/ the frequency to tune, and depending upon > >the range of frequence will turn on/off various transistors to change > >some of the analog curcuit behavior... > > > >My HDTV device drive does all the tuning from userland... > > which driver is this? The DViCO FusionHDTV 5 Lite driver: http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2006-10-2006-12.html#Bt878-Audio-Driver-(aka-FusionHDTV-5-Lite-driver) I have two tuners working in my system at home. > >It was > >a lot easier to get it working using userland than having to constantly > >load/unload kernel modules, and risk crashing the machine... > > you are absolutely spot on about this. it's that i did build upon > pvr250 which had the tuner in kernel space, so i didn't think about > it. otherwise i might have been influenced by the linux source, and i > would have implemented in kernel space as well :-) > > but considering V4L(2), which has to support ioctl's changing the > frequency, how could this work from userland? Kill the V4L(2) API? :) I have thought about doing a cdev bridge to userland.. Effectively FUSE, but for cdev's instead of file systems... This would put most/all the logic in userland, and w/ some mmapping magic, can have similar/same performance for high speed devices like bktr... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070417001817.GZ73385>