Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 08:35:32 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org>, arch@FreeBSD.org, Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.org>, "Sean C. Farley" <sean-freebsd@farley.org> Subject: Re: HEADS DOWN Message-ID: <20070512153532.GQ21795@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20070512160859.T63806@fledge.watson.org> References: <20070505163707.J6670@thor.farley.org> <20070505221125.GA50439@nagual.pp.ru> <20070506091835.A43775@besplex.bde.org> <20070508162458.G6015@baba.farley.org> <20070508222521.GA59534@nagual.pp.ru> <20070509200000.B56490@besplex.bde.org> <20070510184447.H4969@baba.farley.org> <20070511003443.GA6422@nagual.pp.ru> <20070511182126.U9004@baba.farley.org> <20070512160859.T63806@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> [070512 08:11] wrote: > > > Actually, I'm not convinced that crashing the program isn't the right > answer. If an application corrupts memory managed by libc or other > libraries, crashing is generally considered an entirely acceptable failure > mode. Phk malloc has said otherwise for the past ... 10 years? I like how phk malloc has it as an option. -- - Alfred Perlstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070512153532.GQ21795>