Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 May 2007 11:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
To:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   rusage breakdown and cpu limits.
Message-ID:  <20070529105856.L661@10.0.0.1>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm working with Attilio to break down rusage further to be per-thread in 
places where it is protected by the global scheduler lock.  To support 
this, I am interested in moving the rlimit cpulimit check into userret(), 
or perhaps ast().  Is there any reason why we need to check this on every 
context switch?  Any objections to moving it?  Eventually it will require 
a different lock from the one we obtain to call mi_switch().

Jeff



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070529105856.L661>