Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:36:58 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Gabor Tjong A Hung <g.v.tjongahung@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ./options-descr file suggestion for ports Message-ID: <20070613093658.dk1r5iud8gssss0o@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <822946050706120826r75835defj2dbf76fc2ecfccb6@mail.gmail.com> References: <200706090936.51775.david@vizion2000.net> <20070609203316.GC71246@voodoo.bawue.com> <20070611151636.GA16517@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <822946050706120826r75835defj2dbf76fc2ecfccb6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Gabor Tjong A Hung <g.v.tjongahung@gmail.com> (from Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:26:35 +0200): > As it is now some ports don't even have OPTIONS, and you need to define > variables to "define" your options. I don't really understand why this is > done this way, but this is equally annoying. First there where no OPTIONS, then OPTIONS was introduced. If you feel annoyed by those ports which are not converted yet to OPTIONS (because nobody felt annoyed enough to convert them), feel free to submit patches for them. Bye, Alexander. -- A political man can have as his aim the realization of freedom, but he has no means to realize it other than through violence. -- Jean Paul Sartre http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070613093658.dk1r5iud8gssss0o>