Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:21:08 -0400 From: Javier Henderson <javier@kjsl.com> To: Dan Rue <drue@therub.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? Message-ID: <20070620132108447264.6b8a3cd5@kjsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> References: <E745210E-A5B8-48E0-B6A8-A467F1054BD7@svcolo.com> <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:47:49 -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486 >>>> >>>> This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change >>>> current/ expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, >>>> many systems to not get useless e-mail. >>>> >>>> It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done... >>> >>> I second that notion. Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when >>> everything is OK? >> >> So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to >> complain? > > If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or > without this patch. I'm just referring to the assertion that the Unix model is to be quiet when everything is OK. Maybe it's a personal preference, I guess. -jav
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070620132108447264.6b8a3cd5>