Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:57:46 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Espen Skoglund <esk@ira.uka.de> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Snapshot usage guidelines (to avoid stability issues) Message-ID: <20070620165746.GX2268@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <18041.21810.297355.202403@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <18041.21810.297355.202403@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+hLoyg/derPMoKTw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 06:26:26PM +0200, Espen Skoglund wrote: > Hi, >=20 > A couple of days ago I decided to start using snapshots on my system. > Knowing that the functionality has been available for quite some time > now I (apparently wrongly) assumed that it was ready for production > use. My bad. >=20 > My system, a 6-STABLE from week and a half ago, uses two 250GB > gstriped disks and has about 4-5 snapshots on one 215GB UFS partiton. > This morning I learned that things had gone terribly wrong during some > nightly cronjobs, hanging the whole system. Suspecting that snapshots > were the culprit I soon learned after some investigation that the > snapshot functionality wasn't nearly as stable as I had hoped for. >=20 > Looking at PRs and mailing lists there seems to be mainly two > outstanding stability issues with snapshots: a) snapshotted fs running > full, and b) deleting large amount of files on an fs with multiple > snapshots. The former issue, while certainly annoying, one could be > able to work around. The latter issue, on the other hand, seems more > like a definite show stopper. >=20 > Am I right in inferring that the two above cases are main issues with > snaphots at this time, or are there other known gotchas that I have to > look out for. About the issue b). Are you system sources before or after 2007-06-11 10:53:48 UTC ? Or simply show me the version of sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c. If it is less then 1.103.2.24, see developers handbook for instruction on reporting deadlocks. --+hLoyg/derPMoKTw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGeVyKC3+MBN1Mb4gRAsyuAKCr1dQUqYJ3nsknhei7o9vE75klFQCggNjP IPlWviBqi2ZxKmM81SFpE9c= =DjYU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+hLoyg/derPMoKTw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070620165746.GX2268>