Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:30:44 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Cc: LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Rong-en Fan <grafan@gmail.com> Subject: Re: -current cross compile for -stable Message-ID: <20070828213044.GB89132@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <E1IPxEc-0001jJ-4f@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> References: <E1IPxEc-0001jJ-4f@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:19:42PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote: > > On 8/28/07, LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> wrote: > > > Danny Braniss wrote: > > > > till now I used a stable box to cross compile for other > > > > arch/stable|current. today i decided to try out -current as a > > > > base to cross compile. does it work? since i get: > > > > > > > > export MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/r+d/obj/cs4 > > > > cd /r+d/6.2/src; make TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld > > > > ... > > > This won't work. In order to build -STABLE you have to install a > > > chrooted RELENG_6 environment and chroot into it to make it work. > > > > I think there is a hack for ports' tinderbox, patch is at > > http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/binutils.diff > > Not sure it appears in ports@ mailing or tinderbox's. > > well, I can confirm that it works. 1)I'm now testing the result > by using the result to make buildworld - goto 1 :-). > > so, if it works for tinderbox, and for me, can it be 'installed'? There's no reason to - if you want to build RELENG_6 on a 7.x box, you should have RELENG_6 chroot to do so. You'll just keep running into problems as we don't support builds the way you're trying. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070828213044.GB89132>