Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 18:20:08 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org, gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Subject: Re: Support of ISDN Subsystem under Freebsd 6.x/7.x - amd64 Message-ID: <200712011820.09373.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <20071201153523.15682288@peedub.jennejohn.org> References: <474EE92C.3000406@merlin-home.dtdns.net> <47514B53.9000409@ovb.ch> <20071201153523.15682288@peedub.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 01 December 2007, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:53:55 +0100 > > Oliver von Bueren <maillist@ovb.ch> wrote: > > I still don't know why nobody bothers to include the i4b by HPS into the > > main tree. I couldn't use the built-in stack since ages because of the > > lack of proper card support for passive cards with CAPI support, which > > is working in his version. Active ones might be better in the tree. > > HPS has a rather arcane coding style which makes it hard to maintain > his code in the tree. We don't want code in the tree which can be > maintained/understood by only one external developer. > > As a port it would probably be OK, but it might be difficult to > integrate it cleanly. Still, there are other ports which touch the > kernel, so it should be doable. AFAIK HPS hasn't considered this > possiblility. Hi Gary, Regarding code style I have a script that will make the code more FreeBSD KNF compliant. I just haven't had time to work so much at it. If you think you can do better I will gladly accept patches and improvements into my SVN repo. When I started out on ISDN4BSD more than 6 years ago everything was greek to me. Now I understand it all. Maybe that is the problem. You have to spend more time to understand others code ? --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200712011820.09373.hselasky>