Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:12:17 -0600 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ion3 removal (Re: Ion3 license violation) Message-ID: <20071213021217.GA3535@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <200712121930.46708.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> References: <20071212213200.D576216A469@hub.freebsd.org> <200712121701.57460.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <20071212183542.f9bf5e55.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200712121930.46708.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:30:46PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > I expect the port-removal to be initiated/done in an orderly fashion. Claims of license violations absolutely trump any "process requirements". portmgr has the explicit task of keeping the Ports Collection in as best a legal state as possible. Further, note that my initial commit tried to do this, and I asked the author if it was acceptable. It was clear from his reply that it was not -- especially considering the following history: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2007/10/28/0000.html Anyone interested in this thread needs to go read that one first. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071213021217.GA3535>