Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:21:18 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Alec Kloss <alec-keyword-arla.4d43de@SetFilePointer.com> Cc: afs@FreeBSD.org, arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se, Rasmus Kaj <kaj@kth.se> Subject: Re: Patches to get Arla running on FreeBSD 8-CURRENT Message-ID: <20080223161816.K45981@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20080223161249.GH38141@hamlet.setfilepointer.com> References: <20080216035658.W93919@fledge.watson.org> <1203286882.16414.3.camel@heterodyne.kaj> <20080218012608.V96329@fledge.watson.org> <20080222125207.GD38141@hamlet.setfilepointer.com> <20080223092516.O23969@fledge.watson.org> <20080223102922.GF38141@hamlet.setfilepointer.com> <20080223110549.GG38141@hamlet.setfilepointer.com> <20080223161249.GH38141@hamlet.setfilepointer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Alec Kloss wrote: > All of the heavy lifting is done in the big patch at > > http://setfilepointer.com/pub/arla/20080223-arla.diff > > This was generated by taking a current snapshot from arla's CVS, applying > Robert's original patch, and then adding a handful of fixes of my own. The > jist of my changes are autoconf corrections, and one test for > NNPFS_DEBUG_PRIV which is undefined on -CURRENT. There's a general autoconf > problem running around that a few tests require -Werror to work correctly > some can't have -Werror to work correctly. Sounds great, although PRIV_NNPFS_DEBUG should be defined on the most recent -CURRENT; I added it last week, so if you're running a slightly older -CURRENT, that could be why. I believe I also MFC'd to RELENG_7 but it won't make FreeBSD 7.0. > I've run the "-all -fast" tests which don't cause any major issues on > RELENG_7 and -CURRENT, but I do seem to be able to panic 6.x with those > tests. More testers and feedback would be appreciated. > > Can anyone from Arla comment on the chances for incorporating these patches > into Arla itself? It'd be nice to have these changes in Arla itself prior > to submitting the port to FreeBSD. > > And, can anyone comment on need for the arla port to include 0.43, which > works on FreeBSD 5.x? > > Robert, thanks so much for your time. I owe you (at least) a beer. No problem at all -- this is something I've been meaning to do for years, and I'm very pleased all the pieces are coming together :-). Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080223161816.K45981>