Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:54:01 +0200
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To:        Chagin Dmitry <chagin.dmitry@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Call for review && test: linux_kdump-1.6
Message-ID:  <20080412145401.GA4139@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080412181712.Y38920@ora.chd.net>
References:  <20080412181712.Y38920@ora.chd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 06:49:58PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> it here: http://81.200.6.196/linux_kdump-1.6.tar.gz
> 
> That new:
> 1) Functionality from kdump(1) except for ktr_user is transferred
> 2) Rewrited ktr_sysret for correct Linux errno processing (look below)
> 3) Added mksubr
> 
> Known bugs and limitations:
> 1) Some code are ugly and i mark it "XXX"
> 2) I can't test all syscalls and in kdump.c i mark it "NOT TESTED"
> 3) Probably, we have incorrect errno processing in ktr_sysret for syscalls
>    that return EJUSTRETURN, like linux_rt_sigreturn?
 
thnx for the great work!

> And question: whether i can add to linuxolator some ktr_struct
>    functionality?

sure... please provide a patch and I'll take care about it.

thnx!

roman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080412145401.GA4139>