Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:11:56 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> To: "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Who should honor WITHOUT_X11? Message-ID: <20080619191156.00e517f6@peedub.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <7d6fde3d0806190836u2f0f96d6i75b3fc1b4edd73b1@mail.gmail.com> References: <7d6fde3d0806190836u2f0f96d6i75b3fc1b4edd73b1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:36:56 -0700 "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com> wrote: > Trying to build dbus recently on my system without X11 installed, I > ran into a few compile issues because I had put WITHOUT_X11=yes into > src.conf. However, I put WITHOUT_X11=yes into make.conf and was able > to compile dbus properly (in the end). > > So, my questions are: > 1. Should make.conf be responsible for the WITHOUT_X11 or should > another file be responsible for it? > 2. Is it already documented in a manpage somewhere? It isn't > documented in `man make.conf'. > It's documented in src.conf(5) that it only applies to the FreeBSD source tree, which does not include the ports tree. Only make.conf is globally applicable. --- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080619191156.00e517f6>