Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 16:18:23 +1000 From: Fraser Tweedale <frase@frase.id.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gemeral questions (noobish) Message-ID: <20080803061822.GA11518@bacardi.frase.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20080803160640.01940cac@ayiin> References: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> <g725v7$fua$1@ger.gmane.org> <18580.47343.395943.288119@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <200808022235.40815.marshc187@gmail.com> <20080803160640.01940cac@ayiin>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 04:06:40PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:35:40 +0200 > mcassar <marshc187@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > > so most of you _do_ use or prefer csup/cvsup more than portsnap, right?= =20 >=20 > Welcome! :) >=20 > yes and no :P I like portsnap. faster. >=20 > For my ports, i run this script ( ~/bin/update_ports.sh) >=20 > #!/bin/sh > sudo portsnap fetch && sudo portsnap update >=20 > [snip] >=20 Did you know you can specifiy fetch and update at the same time? sudo portsnap fetch update =2E..and save calling portsnap twice :) frase --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiVTa4ACgkQPw/2FZbemTWZkQCfTlXIeuErs72+gyegBDSUGNzm H34AniYcdy79T3JISraLOJnXkmGwKMYM =iNh0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080803061822.GA11518>