Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:22:41 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange TCP issue on RELENG_7 Message-ID: <200808221922.m7MJMcUN091064@lava.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <20080822191146.T66593@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200808221719.m7MHJY25090566@lava.sentex.ca> <20080822191146.T66593@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 03:12 PM 8/22/2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >can you make sure you have this? > >http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/181596 Hi, I do. I am running a GENERIC kernel but with inet6 disabled from yesterday 7.0-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 21 10:27:04 EDT 2008 and with the patch below as TOE seems to be broken for my workload # diff -u sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c.disable --- sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c 2008-08-01 13:47:27.000000000 -0400 +++ sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c.disable 2008-08-22 15:16:50.000000000 -0400 @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct rtentry *rt; int error; + return (EINVAL); + /* * Look up the route used for the connection to * determine if it uses an interface capable of I can try changing to ipfw and see if that makes a difference ? But the RST doesnt sound like a pf issue no ? I would have thought it would just blackhole the packet. ---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200808221922.m7MJMcUN091064>