Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:52:27 +0100 From: xorquewasp@googlemail.com To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, cperciva@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update missed? (was: popen() in multithreaded program - hangs?) Message-ID: <20080927065227.GB4416@logik.internal.network> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0809270105450.3862@sea.ntplx.net> References: <20080926222711.GA74003@logik.internal.network> <48DD73A9.5000505@elischer.org> <20080926234727.GA60860@logik.internal.network> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0809262143130.3227@sea.ntplx.net> <20080927021709.GB60860@logik.internal.network> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0809270105450.3862@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20080927 01:06:22, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > It's not security related, so I don't know whether it would be in a > binary update. You should follow the procedure listed in the links > above. I'm not sure either. In every description I see of freebsd-update, there's a claim that it installs "binary security and errata updates". I only use freebsd-update to update my machines and I was under the impression that I've been getting errata updates too. Could this have been missed on the system used to build updates? I'd be surprised, but you know, these things happen. I've CCd in cperciva@ to see what he thinks... -- xw
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080927065227.GB4416>