Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:09:28 +0100
From:      Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Subject:   Re: Which FreeBSD is best for my PC?
Message-ID:  <200812011309.29942.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
In-Reply-To: <20081201121113.23e67986.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <002701c9538a$10ff0330$005bfb48@harryveltman> <200812011153.12902.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20081201121113.23e67986.freebsd@edvax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 01 December 2008 12:11:13 Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:53:11 +0100, Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> 
wrote:
> > We have a few oldies, just installed KDE 3.5 on a:
> > CPU: VIA Nehemiah (997.17-MHz 686-class CPU)
> >   Origin = "CentaurHauls"  Id = 0x698  Stepping = 8
>
> Oldie @ 1 GHz? You must be joking. I'd bite my hand off for
> such hardware. :-)

No need. Get a job at a computer service store, like my fiancee. You will get 
orphans donated in the 2-3Ghz range "just as long as my data is transfered to 
the new computer". ;)

-- 
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
    and never get to the software part.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812011309.29942.fbsd.questions>