Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:35:49 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Pieter Donche <Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be> Cc: Ebbe Hjorth <ebbe.hjorth@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution Message-ID: <20081202153505.A15540@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0812021517170.11808@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be> References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0812021323380.8329@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be> <1bd820d80812020437h5bd7266co67c566b386b8873e@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0812021347330.9046@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be> <1bd820d80812020457n15f1e6a0s9bd200db05b551f6@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0812021517170.11808@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> So use the amd64 ;) > > Is the amd64 distribution mature enough, as compared to the i386? yes > Aren't there any problems to be expected to arrive, months after > initial install and way in the production usage ?? no. the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081202153505.A15540>