Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 01:41:13 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance benchmarks pitting FreeBSD against Windows Message-ID: <20081208013850.R1852@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <ghhidb$og3$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <0016e64ca7d690e38f045d45227d@google.com> <ghb2qd$ij6$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081205163206.GC25258@kokopelli.hydra> <ghhidb$og3$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Win2003 R2 NTFS RAID10-15 87 25 113 6425 11990 > Ubuntu Server 7.10 ext3 RAID10-15 129 60 167 36114 72562 > Ubuntu Server 7.10 JFS RAID10-15 131 64 167 6638 4855 > Ubuntu Server 7.10 Reiser3 RAID10-15 130 60 159 30307 35101 > Ubuntu Server 7.10 XFS RAID10-15 104 62 164 39 10 > FreeBSD 7 UFS+SU RAID10-15 109 43 111 36551 99999 > FreeBSD 7 UFS+GJ RAID10-15 50 28 103 52460 46604 > FreeBSD 7 ZFS RAID10-15 95 63 180 40522 20260 > > The first three columns describe the system & RAID (e.g. RAID10-15 means > RAID10 created from 4 15 kRPM drives), the next three are > write/rewrite/read speed in MB/s, the last two are random files > created/deleted. I hope the mailer doesn't destroy the formatting too could you compare raw device speed between linux and FreeBSD it looks like there is driver problem - low linear speed. > ZFS was very good, but not so much when compared to Linux file systems, ZFS in your benchmart is similar to UFS.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081208013850.R1852>