Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:38:29 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: prad <prad@towardsfreedom.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors Message-ID: <20081213213446.K44622@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20081213122621.001352ad@gom.home> References: <200812112345.20572.perlcat@alltel.net> <20081212174607.GC36348@kokopelli.hydra> <4942B6A3.504@gmail.com> <18754.48923.616173.319215@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20081212205614.GB37185@kokopelli.hydra> <31371229120906@webmail12.yandex.ru> <87iqppdlzh.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20081213002037.F5665@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081213092104.GC39031@kokopelli.hydra> <20081213103054.B8893@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081213194302.GA51063@kokopelli.hydra> <20081213122621.001352ad@gom.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> good illustrative examples, chad! > > i think moderation has value if it is done reasonably. for instance, it all depends if FreeBSD has to be treated as public projects or somehow private. I'm not talking about open/closed source as it's opensource, but it's private as there are well defined core team+developers, not random people. without moderation it's a mess. It's nice people like to help other people, but it's bad it helps them on that lists with OFF-TOPIC problems. i don't mean moderation like removing one opinions and not others. But removing off-topic messages, that are 95% now or more.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081213213446.K44622>