Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:06:45 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Bernard Dugas <bernard@dugas-family.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Optimising pxeboot disk size
Message-ID:  <20081216160327.N61449@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <4947B50B.7010802@dugas-family.org>
References:  <20081216094719.EDCEE1065675@hub.freebsd.org> <49478749.2030200@dugas-family.org> <20081216123057.M61117@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4947B50B.7010802@dugas-family.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> it's simple:
>
> More simple when you tell it ;-) Thanks a lot, i will try it tonight !

it doesn't have chance - must work :)

>
>> I wish it's helpful, doing this doesn't just save space but saves time - 
>> you have to upgrade software once.
>
> So preserving consistency, which is the most important when you have lot of 
> diskless stations !

exactly. i'm using just NetBSD 1.5 (uses LITTLE memory) + Xserver, so 
there are almost no updates, but anyway - it's stored once.

>> you may like to make /etc-common directory and put most of files there, and 
>> symlinks in each station's /etc
>
> In fact, it makes me think that we miss a concept in mount, or at least i 
> don't know it currently :
> imagine a -tl (TransparentLayer) option for mount, allowing to mount multiple 
> source to the same directory, for instance /etc :

there is already such think - mount_unionfs

but i don't use it.

if you mount over some directory - it's original contents (like my /etc/rc 
doing exec /systemrc) gets hidden.

>
> mount -r yournfsserver:/basic/etc /etc
> mount -tl -r yournfsserver:/TypeX/etc /etc
> mount -tl -r yournfsserver:/StationY/etc /etc

mount_unionfs

but i don't know how stable it is.

> When you want to change something, you add a rw TransparentLayer :
> mount -tl yournfsserver:/StationYchanges/etc /etc
>
> So that changed or added files are only stored in this rw partition, thus 
> very small and easy to manage.
>
> This would be a kind of partition inheritance, like in object languages... 
> Dreams are allowed :-)

try mount_unionfs



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081216160327.N61449>