Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:09:51 -0500 From: Jerry <gesbbb@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hi Message-ID: <20090223160951.056f54d1@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20090223195041.GC58188@kokopelli.hydra> References: <9ef7e7380902220154t74657d52uc9497c77672b79f8@mail.gmail.com> <9a52b1190902220711u65e38320t97ca56547bef246d@mail.gmail.com> <87ljryccm0.fsf@kobe.laptop> <49a20440.oqh9j8d04xp6dYo8%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <87mycd847c.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20090223195041.GC58188@kokopelli.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/ne.nAVJWIenpYdjD5FR00/x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:50:41 -0700 Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote: [snip] >I can see both sides of this argument. Maybe we need to split up >FreeBSD documentation into two domains, similarly to the way FreeBSD >software is split into two domains (core and ports) -- and thus have a >place outside the FreeBSD handbook for the same, >more-than-professional quality of documentation, but covering things >we wouldn't be comfortable putting in the FreeBSD Handbook itself. Specifically, what is it we are uncomfortable putting in the handbook? More importantly, what good is a handbook if it is not complete? Would the documentation be cross indexed so a user could find more details on a particular subject? Personally, while perfectly plausible, it sounds like more work than it is worth. --=20 Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com Memory fault - where am I? --Sig_/ne.nAVJWIenpYdjD5FR00/x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmjEKcACgkQBvaKIJWWCO3J6QCgmhMCVpibFp39HgP13mY+Cmcz vjgAnj0YVGt+VqGiGMNyUMniLhKt9hb2 =X7iG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ne.nAVJWIenpYdjD5FR00/x--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090223160951.056f54d1>