Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 20:33:46 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> To: "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: new linux infrastructure ports are committed Message-ID: <20090402183346.GA32707@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904021222330.20710@thor.farley.org> References: <23488525@bb.ipt.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904021222330.20710@thor.farley.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:33:42PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > >Hello List, > > > >I've just committed new Linux Fedora 8 infrastructure ports. That was > >a long awaited commit. Thanks for all who helped me here. 47 new ports > >are introduced as well as a new linux ports infrastructure which made > >it possible to co-exist ports from different linux distros at our > >ports tree. The worked lasted for more than a year. > > Thank you to all involved. > > *snip* > > >As you may already know, only 8-CURRENT is compatible with > >compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16. FreeBSD-7.x is not fully compatible due > >to lack of some syscalls, etc. Those syscalls cannot be MFCed due to > >native FreeBSD ABI breakage. Some applications may work fine though. > > What cannot be MFC'd besides TLS and NPTL? For syscalls that cannot be linuxulator in RELENG_7 supports TLS/NPTL
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090402183346.GA32707>