Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:53:18 +0300
From:      Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
Cc:        Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org>, sahil@tandon.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: has Postfix new location of aliases.db?
Message-ID:  <20090604135318.0178eb66@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A279C92.4020305@quip.cz>
References:  <4A279C92.4020305@quip.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/oTt.0x4wJ0Eh5WQ.=vll95b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:06:10 +0200
Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote:

> Was something changed in Postfix defaults?
> After upgrade from postfix-2.5.6,1 to postfix-2.6.1,1 and restart of=20
> postfix, I got following error in /var/log/maillog
>=20
> fatal: open database /etc/mail/aliases.db: No such file or directory
>=20
> All previous versions were using /etc/aliases.db, new version expect=20
> /etc/mail/aliases.db
>=20
> newaliases command re-generate aliases.db in the new location.
>=20
>=20
> root@fido ~/# ls -al /etc/aliases*
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel    12B Feb 24  2008 /etc/aliases@ ->
> mail/aliases -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel    12K Jan 20
> 11:30 /etc/aliases.db
>=20
> root@fido ~/# ls -al /etc/mail/aliases*
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   1.7K Oct 22  2008 /etc/mail/aliases
>=20
> root@fido ~/# newaliases
>=20
> root@fido ~/# ls -al /etc/mail/aliases*
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   1.7K Oct 22  2008 /etc/mail/aliases
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel    12K Jun  4 11:39 /etc/mail/aliases.db
>=20
> If this is expected behavior, this should be mentioned in UPDATING.
>=20
> machine details:
> FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #0: Fri May  1 08:49:13 UTC 2009=20
> root@walker.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386
>=20
> fresh ports tree updated by `portsnap fetch update`, postfix upgraded
> by `portmaster postfix-2.5.6,1`

I got bitten by  this also, but I though it was only my lack of
attention.

In the future, please CC the maintainer of the port, it will get faster
response time.

--=20
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B

--Sig_/oTt.0x4wJ0Eh5WQ.=vll95b
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkonp54ACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeXN+wCgmRFaWKQOKJ/bUQ/RPO2OPT6G
+IQAn1yTlN3I+zp1SLH/QscMq76bw867
=HReE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/oTt.0x4wJ0Eh5WQ.=vll95b--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090604135318.0178eb66>