Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:28:23 +0200
From:      cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws>
To:        Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Our old friend, the small default layout is back...
Message-ID:  <20090826162823.GF11739@phenom.cordula.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4A950054.4080104@andric.com>
References:  <4A94382A.5080708@stillbilde.net> <4A944612.6010107@netability.ie> <4A945216.4040603@stillbilde.net> <4A94528A.5030609@netability.ie> <4A950054.4080104@andric.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:28:52AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2009-08-25 23:07, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > Someone will complain.  There's always someone.
> 
> And of course, if you crank the default root fs size to 1 GiB, the
> complaints will come that "FreeBSD wastes your disk space". ;)

Kids theres days... ;-)

But seriously now: as someone using FreeBSD on embedded devices, I'll
definitely complain. There's absolutely NO reason a root partition
should be that big (in the default install)!

Where's the bloat coming from anyway? From debug symbols of *two*
kernels (/boot/kernel, and /boot/kernel.old)! Nothing prevents us
from moving those debug symbols outside that tree into another
partition (e.g. /var).

Please keep / minimalistic. Everything else can be worked around
nicely; an ever growing root fs (a la Linux?) being the notable
exception.

Thanks,
-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090826162823.GF11739>