Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:56:50 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: problem with building /usr/ports/java/jdk16 in 'nohup' mode Message-ID: <20091016075650.GA2059@current.Sisis.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, If you build the port /usr/ports/java/jdk16 in 'nohup' mode it loops later in the question about the license: ===> Extracting for jdk-1.6.0.3p4_12 => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-src-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar. => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-src-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar. => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-bin-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar. => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-bin-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar. => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-mozilla_headers-b05-unix-24_sep_2007.jar. => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-mozilla_headers-b05-unix-24_sep_2007.jar. => MD5 Checksum OK for bsd-jdk16-patches-4.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-jdk16-patches-4.tar.bz2. => MD5 Checksum OK for tzupdater-1_3_18-2009k.zip. => SHA256 Checksum OK for tzupdater-1_3_18-2009k.zip. ===> jdk-1.6.0.3p4_12 depends on executable: unzip - found /bin/sh /usr/ports/java/jdk16/files/license.sh JAVA RESEARCH LICENSE Version 1.6 I. DEFINITIONS. .... Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no] Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no] Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no] Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no] ... until file syste is full :-( The script /usr/ports/java/jdk16/files/license.sh should be changed to check if STDIN is a terminal, and if not should assume 'yes'. Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e <guru@unixarea.de> - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Vote NO to EU The Lisbon Treaty: http://www.no-means-no.eu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091016075650.GA2059>