Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:26:15 +0100
From:      Pieter de Goeje <pieter@degoeje.nl>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        Reko Turja <reko.turja@liukuma.net>, Ed Jobs <oloringr@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Any chance ZFS becoming default?
Message-ID:  <200912192126.15581.pieter@degoeje.nl>
In-Reply-To: <E7A4C254FF8D4B1AAB27E63078A83F3B@rivendell>
References:  <6c51dbb10912190642s43ec0f2bj69047a0d5a0690ae@mail.gmail.com> <200912192018.59607.oloringr@gmail.com> <E7A4C254FF8D4B1AAB27E63078A83F3B@rivendell>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 19 December 2009 19:49:17 Reko Turja wrote:
> > under Other Kernel:
> > ZFS as default
>
> So anyone running 32bit or under 2Gb of memory don't need to bother
> with FreeBSD anymore after 9.0 RELEASE?

Don't spread FUD please. If you had read the WIKI you would know it talks 
about sysinstall support for ZFS, not about removing UFS.

- Pieter de Goeje




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200912192126.15581.pieter>