Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:49:41 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: COMPAT_IA32 renamed COMPAT_FREEBSD32 Message-ID: <201004071549.41672.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4BBB5225.5020008@freebsd.org> References: <20100312171758.GB31089@dragon.NUXI.org> <l2wa31046fc1004050812q4b7c4437oc4a50ec1c834d2ab@mail.gmail.com> <4BBB5225.5020008@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 11:24:21 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > pluknet wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the interesting part for me is how to properly assert now a value of e.g. > > KINFO_PROC_SIZE varying on err.. different COMPAT_FREEBSD32 arches > > (say, FreeBSD would have _kern_proc FreeBSD32 compat layer for top/ps/). > > > > > Probably the cleanest thing would be to set KINFO_PROC_SIZE in > machine/proc.h instead of where it is now, and then also define a > KINFO_PROC32_SIZE or something in the same place. Also, that would be a > really nice feature. Yes, I think this sounds like the best approach. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201004071549.41672.jhb>