Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:25:59 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Jerry <freebsd.user@seibercom.net> Subject: Re: HAL must die! Message-ID: <201103160925.59230.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <20110315203753.55f1ec3b@scorpio> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103061251530.95312@abbf.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <4D7FE8E1.90600@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20110315203753.55f1ec3b@scorpio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Wednesday 16 March 2011 07:37:53 Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:32:01 +1000 > Da Rock <freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> articulated: > > > On 03/08/11 03:00, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 07:31:43AM -0800, Nerius Landys wrote: > > > > > The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to > choose from. when it comes to screwing, we use - at least outside the USA - metric screws. M3, M4 ... M10 ... We do not care much who manufactured them. The software industry is still far away from this. > Now, as far as HAL goes, the fragmented open-source community cannot > even begin to agree on its replacement. Every distro is busy trying to It looks like a bunch of little Napoleons. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201103160925.59230.erichfreebsdlist>