Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:42:00 +0300
From:      Krutov Mikle <nekoexmachina@gmail.com>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HAL must die!
Message-ID:  <20110317144200.GA28942@takino.org>
In-Reply-To: <il2qar$ka1$1@dough.gmane.org>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103061251530.95312@abbf.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <il2qar$ka1$1@dough.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:32:59PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 19:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
> >Using the -C switch with portupgrade, I am managing to turn WITH_HAL off in
> >ports that I install or upgrade. Is there a way to make this a global
> >default?
> >
> >Is there a (convenient) way to list ports that might pull in HAL without
> >having a configuration switch?
> 
> Um, why exactly are so many people against HAL? It's the only
> cross-platform thing available for non-Linux systems which handles
> device enumeration, hotplugs, etc.
> 
Hi Ivan!
As for me, it is like a habit:
I've installed Xorg + HAL for the first time;
I've seen that my config is ignored;
I disabled HAL by-default in make.conf
:)
--
With best regards, Mikle Krutov, Bercut ltd. VA$I engeneer.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110317144200.GA28942>