Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:21:01 +0200
From:      Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
To:        bf1783@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.org, gerald@FreeBSD.org, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Subject:   Re: Has anyone tested the jack update - am I ok to commit it?
Message-ID:  <20110918152101.GA88715@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAGFTUwNMqpOcYLZCzbZ7tj5qqZF6UXm6zv-%2BH3ZxYNa9U9VQCA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAGFTUwNMqpOcYLZCzbZ7tj5qqZF6UXm6zv-%2BH3ZxYNa9U9VQCA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:19:27PM -0400, b. f. wrote:
> > This port is maintained by this list (multimedia@) so I thought
> > I better ask once more before committing... :)  The update is
> > here:
> >
> >         http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/jack-0.120.1.patch
> >
> > and I first mentioned it in this thread:
> >
> >         http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2011-September/012432.html
> >
> > (Using a midi keyboard with FreeBSD (jack update, ardour3 alpha...))
> 
> While I understand you have already invested some time in testing
> this, I don't think it would be wise to update only to 0.120.1 -- the
> latest release is 0.121.2, and the release notes for 0.120.2 and
> subsequent releases mention not only significant enhancements, but
> some important bug-fixes, e.g.:
> 
Ooops!  I guess that's what I get for only checking the latest
version number on the project homepage...  I'll prepare an updated
update. :)

> "Fix issues with stack initialization in client threads that stole
> large chunks of the stack from applications",
> 
> "Fix memory overrun when calling jack_get_ports() with arguments that
> lead it to return all existing ports",
> 
> "Remove client->control->nframes data element and use
> control->engine->buffer_size. This fixes erroneous behaviour when
> trying to get the buffer size associated with JACK port type",
> 
> ...
> 
> Also, please consider merging the following changes in yours:
> 
> -- clean up ugly flag handling
> 
 Can you elaborate?

> -- make the building of the HTML documentation an OPTION,
> off-by-default -- the doxygen dependency, which by default drags in
> many Python, graphviz, TeX, and Qt4 dependencies, is too heavy a
> burden for package builders and testers, and it was never a good idea
> to require it in order to build a small audio server.  (These changes
> could be replaced by packaging the documents in a separate,
> locally-mirrored tarball, or, provided that the port is kept
> up-to-date, by downloading them from the master site.)

 Ok, making docs an OPTION should be easy.

 Thanx!
	Juergen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110918152101.GA88715>