Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:14:33 +0700
From:      Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>
To:        Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Patent  hit - MS goes after Linux - FreeBSD ?
Message-ID:  <20120803081433.0ad12c03@AMD620.ovitrap.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120802185759.GB12255@hemlock.hydra>
References:  <loom.20120801T135633-743@post.gmane.org> <E012414FCF65894B89F69DE76AE15E9908274802@CPT-EXCH01.int.mtnbusiness.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208011511490.3256@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <E012414FCF65894B89F69DE76AE15E9908274973@CPT-EXCH01.int.mtnbusiness.net> <20120802185759.GB12255@hemlock.hydra>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:57:59 -0600
Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 01:39:21PM +0000, Traiano Welcome wrote:
> > >
> Unfortunately, patent law and copyright law are very different
> environments.  The truth is that probably every nontrivial piece of

yes.

> software created infringes several patents, and the only question that
> remains is whether those patents would hold up in court under close

The best tool against any patents is prior art.

The open source scene misses a very simple platform. Even FreeBSD could
offer an extra list named 'prior-art' on which people can publish their
ideas. The moment the server starts distributing the e-mail, nobody can
claim a patent anywhere in the world for the idea mentioned.

> scrutiny.  The greater the disparity in legal expertise and funding
> behind the two parties, the greater the likelihood that the case will
> be found in favor of the party with the greater resources.

Not true for cases of prior art.
> 
> This is the reason software patents comprise such a blight on the
> world of software development.  Even a frivolous patent that would

There is no difference for an engineer who works in other fields.

> not hold up through completion of litigation may serve its purpose by
> bankrupting a defendant before the case is concluded.

That party must have a real dumb patent attorney then.
> 
> It is possible that Microsoft is going the way of SCO -- into its
> grave, having hung all its hopes on litigation.  Along the way,
> though, it will probably do a lot of damage to a lot of people,
> projects, and businesses, and I just hope it doesn't get as far as
> the FreeBSD project or any FreeBSD users before things come crashing
> down.
> 
It is all in the people's mind.

> (disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.  This is not legal advice.  Et
> cetera.)
> 
This is an example of the real problem.

Erich



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120803081433.0ad12c03>