Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 02 Feb 2013 21:52:17 +0900
From:      Tsurutani Naoki <turutani@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To:        Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/175776: patching x11-servers/xorg-server fails
Message-ID:  <201302021252.AA00132@h115.65.228.10.32118.vlan.kuins.net>
In-Reply-To: <510D0463.9030004@freebsd.org>
References:  <510D0463.9030004@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
xorg-server-1.10.6_2,1
xorg-vfbserver-1.10.6_1,1
are installed.
All the Xorg related ports are installed after setting "WITH_NEW_XORG=1".

Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 02/02/13 13:09, Tsurutani Naoki wrote:
> > Thank you for your reply.
> > 
> > Both files on my host are just same with that on SVN repository you pointed.
> > I think only "files/extra-new-arch-i386" is used with "WITH_NEW_XORG=1".
> > The file "hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h" made by "make extract" differs from
> > the one expeced by the patch file (see line 1335 and 1371).
> > Is there anything wrong on my host or on my thought ?
> > 
> 
> Only extra-new-arch-i386 is used when compiling with WITH_NEW_XORG.
> Both patches fixes the same issue, but in different versions of
> xorg-server, the old and the new.  Which version of xorg-server are
> getting built?  Is it the correct one?  As I previously said, I can't
> reproduce this issue, and I've been running builds for different freebsd
> versions of i386 both with old and new xorg during the night without
> problems.
> Regards!
> -- 
> Niclas Zeising
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201302021252.AA00132>