Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:31:48 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> Cc: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, FreeBSD questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn & new pkg system Message-ID: <20130310173148.02bd958efa4538938992dc97@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <513CC04C.3020403@a1poweruser.com> References: <513BC4E2.4040708@a1poweruser.com> <87ppz8ceje.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20795.63556.581627.956239@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20130310150820.GA20819@saturn> <513CC04C.3020403@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:18:04 -0400 Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> wrote: > No body has made a case for NOT including svn in the base system. If it > can be a port there is no reason why it can not be included in the base > system. Giorgos did when he said "Subversion is a large system, with a ton of dependencies" which translates to a lot of work to keep it up to date in the base system, and all sorts of fun and games when other things using those dependencies need a newer version. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130310173148.02bd958efa4538938992dc97>