Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:58:05 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick <jdc@koitsu.org> To: Olav =?unknown-8bit?B?R3L4buVz?= Gjerde <olavgg@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfsv3 vs nfsv4 ? advantages of moving to v4? Message-ID: <20130428145805.GA81766@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <CALL7tK8Fvy-pLvp3uiONwS1ynqT%2B7-633X2Mx5AvjpM7mH2imQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALL7tK8Fvy-pLvp3uiONwS1ynqT%2B7-633X2Mx5AvjpM7mH2imQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 04:53:53PM +0200, Olav Grns Gjerde wrote: > The main reason I moved to nfsv4 was that I could export multiple ZFS > filesystem with just one export. With nsfv3 I could only export one ZFS > filesystem per export. When you say "one/per export", what exactly do you mean? For exporting ZFS filesystems via NFS, I've always used /etc/exports. I've never used the "share" property per ZFS filesystem, because in my experience (at the time -- this was early days of ZFS on FreeBSD) it just flat out didn't work. Using /etc/exports always worked for me. I always liked having all my exported filesystems in one place (/etc/exports), versus UFS ones in /etc/exports + ZFS ones requiring me to use "zfs get ..." and so on. Does it really bother you that much to have multiple lines in /etc/exports (using NFSv3)? -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@koitsu.org | | UNIX Systems Administrator http://jdc.koitsu.org/ | | Mountain View, CA, US | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130428145805.GA81766>