Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 17:18:57 -0500 From: Graham Allan <allan@physics.umn.edu> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp Message-ID: <20130502221857.GJ32659@physics.umn.edu> In-Reply-To: <75CB6F1E-385D-4E51-876E-7BB8D7140263@hub.org> References: <834305228.13772274.1367527941142.JavaMail.root@k-state.edu> <75CB6F1E-385D-4E51-876E-7BB8D7140263@hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:05:38PM -0700, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >=20 > The thing is, I'm not convinced it is a NFS related issue =E2=80=A6 the= re are *so* many other variables involved =E2=80=A6 it could be something= with the network stack =E2=80=A6 it could be something with the schedule= r =E2=80=A6 it could be =E2=80=A6 hell, it could be like the guy states i= n that blog posting (http://antibsd.wordpress.com/) and be the compiler c= hanges =E2=80=A6=20 I'm just watching interestedly from the sidelines, and I hesitate to ask because it seems too obvious - maybe I missed something - but have you run both tests (Linux and FreeBSD) purely with local disk, to get a baseline independent of NFS? Graham
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130502221857.GJ32659>