Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:25:06 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Julio Merino <jmmv@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> Subject: Re: Can fmake be deleted? Message-ID: <20140422202506.GA63561@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CAFY7cWAdWETwZH1Cb_BQY%2B7Eh-kVd9n0V8a%2Bu1a6J069aWCONA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFY7cWAdWETwZH1Cb_BQY%2B7Eh-kVd9n0V8a%2Bu1a6J069aWCONA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:20:46PM -0700, Julio Merino wrote: > Hello, >=20 > The WITHOUT_BMAKE=3Dyes build has been broken for over a month and, as > far as I can tell, only tinderbox noticed... (Should be fixed with a > commit I made yesterday but tinderbox hasn't caught up yet.) >=20 > Question: is there any reason to keep the old fmake around or could it > be deleted along all the MK_BMAKE logic? >=20 At least for the ports side the plan is to drop fmake support as soon as possible. regards, Bapt --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlNW0CIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwIRwCdFt/eEZoOa0Gnz55ef7l5ze2i vQcAoIeeKiRG+u3gJAgzAm6N2COw2MLI =L6za -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140422202506.GA63561>