Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 22:43:14 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Milan Obuch <freebsd-ports@dino.sk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/courier build failures on newer FreeBSD versions Message-ID: <20140525204314.GR2341@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20140525222726.47261ae9@zeta.dino.sk> References: <20140525213854.0d952d1d@zeta.dino.sk> <20140525201008.GQ2341@home.opsec.eu> <20140525222726.47261ae9@zeta.dino.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > > In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which > > > addresses this issue > > > (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is really > > > simple and should solve package builder failures for [REL - > > > 10i386-default], [REL - 10amd64-default], [REL - 10i386-quarterly], > > > [REL - 10amd64-quarterly], [REL - head-i386-default] and [REL - > > > head-amd64-default]. > > > > The commit system rejects ports which are still unstaged, so we > > we need a patch which also addresses staging. > > As far as I understand, you are the maintainer ? > Yes, I just use unique addresses for mailing lists... > > Patch for stage is in works, but as mail/courier is a complex port, I > need to investigate various cases. Currently I work on pkg-plist, and > some questions will come, I am sure. Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly behind the times, aren't we ? > I just do not like to submit uncomplete work, and patch mentioned > solves the other issue, and being simple... Well, I have a patch for eclipse-devel, which is not accepted, because it's not staged either. So I'm in the same situation 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140525204314.GR2341>