Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:20:16 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Lukas Ruf <Lukas.Ruf@lpr.ch> Subject: Re: print/muttprint Message-ID: <20141011152016.GA78035@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20141011115119.GI29437@home.opsec.eu> References: <20141011114310.GA4035@unixarea.DDR.dd> <20141011115119.GI29437@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > I need print/muttprint to print my mails. > > Should I file a PR with the patch or could someone commit it? > > A PR is always preferred for the audit trail. I committed it, with > the change of maintainer mentioned below. mat@ mailed that USE_TEX=latex dvipsk should be used instead of the two additional run_deps. Can you test if this works in your use-case and report the results ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141011152016.GA78035>