Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:28:57 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, mat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: print/muttprint Message-ID: <20141011162857.GJ29437@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20141011153949.GA5022@unixarea.DDR.dd> References: <20141011114310.GA4035@unixarea.DDR.dd> <20141011115119.GI29437@home.opsec.eu> <20141011152016.GA78035@home.opsec.eu> <20141011153949.GA5022@unixarea.DDR.dd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > mat@ mailed that > > > > USE_TEX=latex dvipsk > > > > should be used instead of the two additional run_deps. > > A side note: > > bapt switched from 'latex' to texlive: [...] > > Can you test if this works in your use-case and report the results ? Btw, what is your use-case ? How do you invoke muttprint and what does it call and what does it do in the end ? Does it really generate a .ps to send to the printer ? > > and yes, when you compile the port directly with > > # make install > > 'USE_TEX= texlive' pulls in > Tex, but it does not if you compile the ports with poudriere. I'm surprised that USE_TEX=texlive in poudriere does not pull it in. Can you provide a build log to show this ? > I brought > this question up in freebsd-pkg@ but did not got any comments on this. > > I can revoke the change in my VM / poudriere and send in a complete log > of the compilation of print/muttprint if someone is willing to dig into. Yes, please. > For the moment, I have not found any other solution as the two > additional lines. Well, if it solves your problem, then it's definitly a good sign 8-) -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141011162857.GJ29437>