Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:31:15 +0200 From: francesco scaglione <scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading libvpx demands bash Message-ID: <20150602173115.d3b132732fa17f42e97538e7@neuf.fr> In-Reply-To: <556DB137.3090007@freebsd.org> References: <20150602121740.f2af02dcd9be77d4ac18ab41@neuf.fr> <DUB118-W11341C5F62F8F0A449B6799BB50@phx.gbl> <20150602133523.c14287e0faa0884da67f26ef@neuf.fr> <DUB118-W202EFAABF484BA0D4EEBC09BB50@phx.gbl> <CAKE2PDuaOtmowU1ribnzxzHLysT6853Aa0iZaEb%2Bfu8BWOTVsA@mail.gmail.com> <556DB137.3090007@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:35:51 +0100 Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 06/02/15 14:03, jungle Boogie wrote: > > On 2 June 2015 at 05:58, Alexandre Labarre > > <alexandre_ml@outlook.fr> wrote: > >> > Packages are built once per week for the moment (every Wednesday > >> > if I remember well). > > > > I've always heard the one per week. Do you know if that's only if > > the port changes or does it build regardless of any update? > > Packages are being built several times a week now. There should be > updates something like 3 times a week, although that may be modified > if there is some bad security hole or other problem having > significant impact. > > Cheers, > > Matthew I had never thought that packages were a better option for tiny machines like mines. But that could really be the case, since I always fear the moment my Intel Atom has to update big ports like gcc, which is required by... # pkg info -r gcc gcc-4.8.4_3: libvpx-1.3.0 ouch, libvpx again! So, with packages, no more gcc nor bash, is that right? Thanks for the tip, Francesco
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150602173115.d3b132732fa17f42e97538e7>